zaterdag 19 januari 2019


Zijn electrische auto's schoon?

Over electrische auto's dat ze zo schoon zijn.
We worden wel vals voorgelicht en iedereen holt achter iedereen aan. Zelfs holt iedereen achter de foute voorlichter aan, met het gebrul over milieu en schonere auto's.
Feit is: electrische auto's zijn helemaal niet zo schoon als iedereen denkt.
Op zich lijkt het eindproduct, de electrische auto, een schone energiebron te zijn. IS DAT WEL ZO ???
Kijken we naar de produktie, dan moet de auto gemaakt worden, dat is in principe dezelfde vervuiling als de benzine auto.
Echter HET ACCUPAKKET is dermate groot dat daarvoor een enorme hoeveelheid vervuiling plaatsvindt . Want het is bekend dat het fabriceren van een accu grote vervuiling plaatsvinden vanwege de chemicaliƫn.
Het produceren van lithium vergt heel veel milieu onvriendelijk procedures.
En de electrische auto's hebben nogal wat accu's in de auto staan.
Het 2e punt is het opladen:
Meestal rijden de auto's overdag en worden of op(vlakbij) het werk opgeladen of 's avonds thuis.
In beide gevallen staan ze aan het openbare electrische netwerk vanuit de centrales die nog steeds voor meer dan 60% gestookt worden met gas of kolen (= hele sterke vervuiling).

Het is ook een raadsel waarom electrische auto's niet uitgerust worden met zonnepanelen op het dak en motorkap, waardoor ze opgeladen kunnen worden als ze stilstaan.
Dus het hele milieu gebeuren is een farce en wordt uitgemolken over de ruggen van de consumenten (jan met de pet).
Iedereen denkt schone energie te gebruiken met een electrische auto, maar dat is helemaal niet zo. Tenminste grotendeels niet.
En het merendeel van de gebruikers doen het allen maar om het financiƫle gewin. Want zodra de subsidie op de belasting voor de electrische auto wegvalt, valt de verkoop van de electrische auto nagenoeg stil. (geen financieel voordeel meer).

Hetzelfde geld eigenlijk ook voor de zonnepanelen, maar daar krijg je nog rendement van.
Nu heb ik een artikel gelezen over een aanvulling van de zonnepanelen.
De zonnepanelen woren warmer naarmate de zon schijnt. Deze warmte kan opgevangen worden door een zgn warmteplaat waar water inzit. Dit water wordt dan verwarmt en kan worden gebruikt om warm water te gebruiken (douchen, verwarming).(pvt innovatie)
Ik zal hier een link toevoegen wie en waar dat te gebruiken is.
Useallenergy.nl
Hierdoor wordt het gebruik van zonnepanelen nog nuttiger (zeker voor de portemonnaie


bob dammann

maandag 7 januari 2019

Sinking of the TITANIC


Are we manipulated over and over again?

Well I think so and in this book I will give you a lot of data so you can decide by yourself if it is true.

I am a dutch citysan and i am looking around on internet , in the library to look for dutch and worldwide dishonestness and i found a lot of it.
I will be going back about 100 years from now (2016) or a little more and sometimes i will go back a thousend years or more to give you the information of the life then.

I am writing this blog to let anyone know what is wrong in the “HIGH SOCIATY”.

I do not say everything I wrote is true, but because all of the facts I faced, the truth is not so far away and after reading, a lot of people see that all is close to the truth.
Of course there are lot of people who think that all is a hoax, but as you look at the facts then may be you look at it an other way.
I have also enclosed some links i found on internet to let see what others found and discovered.
I hope you find the blog interesting enough to read and may be your point of view is somewhat eltered
We wish you a lot of reading pleasure.
Bob Dammann


Chapter one.

I start within this chapter with a so called “algemeen gevoel” ( a overall feeling) of being a slave of the gouvernement and all the people who roules the country.

I start with about a 100 years ago with the sinking of the TiTANIC.
Is that an accident or is there more behind the scene?
I studied a lot of data and did notice that a lot of people had a benefit from the sinking of the titanic.
Especialle the owner who was on the ship and managed to go in a lifeboat and was saved.
He earned a lot of money.
Before the sinking he had made an assurance for the ship which was very high. So if the ship was shipwrecked he should earn a lot of money. AND THE SHIP(TITANIC-OLYMPUS) WAS SHIP WRECKED.(sunk).
The other ship in the neighberhood did not hear the help, an other ship was far away.
It is all too “coinsidently” so there was no help. Only a few ours later..
Kapitalism is the most great enemy of the people, for because of the money. People life is not interesting and a lot of people died because of the money.
If you read more about the titanic, then you read a unbelievable release.

  1. The sistership of the titanic (the olympic) had several damages and had to be repair.

Because of the demage the high insutance for that ship was much lower then that of the Titanic.And the costs of repair was very high.
The week before the tiranic start his trip, both ships were in the dock for meanteneance and repair.
Both ships were identical and a few titanic identicals were swapped with the olympia. Even the name was swapped. In the wreckage of the sunken titanic you can see that the Olympic letters were to see.
Why swap the ships (Titanic becomes Olypic and Olympic will be Titanic).
Answer: insurance money.
The Titanic was insured for 12 miljoen dollar and the Olypic only for 8 miljon.
So, if the Titanic sunk the insurance money was much higher.
An extra point is:
It was arranged that the Carpadia was in the neighberhood to saved all passengers.
The Carpadia was sailing of with no cargo, but with extra cool.
At the collission of the ('Titanic”) a fishing boot fired a light racket. The carpedia has seen it but was not the code she was waiting for. That is why she was not coming.
An other ship has seen the light code of the Titanic and helped after 2 hours.
The captain knew this arrangement and the 1e officier knew as well.
This was an aggreement was the englisch gouvernement, because of the unemployment.
So it was an arrangemnt that all passengers will be saved by the Carpedia, who was in the neighberhood..
All sighns of a collision for the ship were ignored and on purpose the kaptain ordered to have a collision.
The marconist was not able to receive messages fram other ships because he was busy with sending messages to family of the high class passengers.
In Short: the Titanic was dilabetely sunk to receice a lot of insurance money.
And the death of passengers was not interesting for those high sociaty people.

Kapitalism

The commerc/kapitalisme is not so good as we think, because of everybody wants to earn money for a better life.
BUT all the inventions for a free energy in the world are sold out and a lot of people are killed for their invention.

The benzine or diesel motorcars are a good invention, but if Tessla got his idea working, then all the cars could run on electra insted of benzine and diesel, with their filthy pollution.

Even the coleindustry is a kapitalisationindustry, so the bosses can earn from that. Also here is a big BUT.... There should be no cole, oil, nuclear energy industry , for if the electricity is free then everything can run on the free energy. No pollution, no big bills to pay, and everyone can live freely and more happyness.


I have a lot of announcements from the gouvernement what is very dishonest. In fact the gouvernement is lying to us.
I will give you a number of dishonest announsments from the gouvenemet world wide to let us know what they think you must believe. After that i will explain that the data is the other way around and that the gouvernement is lying to us, so they can do things what the people cost a lot of money to pay in the form of tax.

  1. The sinking of the TITANIC.
Now in 2015 it is announced that a sistership of the titanic is used for the titanic. This sistership was as good as the original titanic. The olympic, the sistership was redoped to titanic, but not as good as the original titanic.
Just before the voyage to new york, the owner of the titanic had made an assurance on the titanic that was very high.
The Olympic heeft 2 aanvaringen gehad met 2 andere schepen en was flink beschadid, veel meer dan ze toe wilden geven. En dat zou heel veel gaan kosten. Provisorisch hebben ze toen zo goed als mogelijk de Olympic gerepareed, maar de kiel bleek ook krom te zijn.
Via de verzekering kregen ze niets terug van de schade van de OLYMPIC.
Omdat het zoveel zou gaan kosten hebben de Morgen en Esmee besloten de namen in een weekend te verwisselen van de schepen, zodat de beschadigede Olympic nu de Titanic zou gaan heten.
De echte Titanic was dus onbeschadigd en kon dus zo uitvaren.
De nieuwe TITANIC voer dus uit (eigenlijk de OLYMPIC) , welke dus al zwaar gehavend was.
Echter de verzekering was afgesloten voor de TITANIC.
Dus als de nieuwe TITANIC (eigenlijk Olympic) nu zou zinken hoefden ze geen hoge reparatie kosten te betalen en kregen ze van de verzekering het volle pond voor een schip dat verongelukt was en op papier gaaf. (12 miljoen) terwijl de bouwkosten van een nieuw schip zo'n 10 miljoen kostte.
Ook de engelse regering zat in het complot, omdat de white line in financiele moeilijkheden kwam te verkeren door de enorme kosten van reparatie van de Olyppic. Ihet zou , als de line faiet zou gaan 20.000 werlozen opleveren.
In die tijd was er ook al een staking van de mijnwerkers, zodat de situatie in engeland er niet beter op werd.
Officieel wist de regering van niets, maar de fraude is wel door gegaan.
De aanvaring van de “TITANIC” met een ijsberg is met opzet gedaan.
Voor info kunt u kijken op:


Then the titanic was demmaged against an iceberg and begum to sunk.
and



It is very daubtfull that the other ship in the neaberhood was not able to hear the sos from the titanic.
Even the telegraphist was ordered to send meassages to family of the passengers.
He was so busy (order of the president of the line).

No help frrom the other ship and the owner of the ship was on board and was safed because he was able to go in a lifeboat!!!!!

It looks like that the owner gave the order to wait for help in the meantime the ship was sinking.
That the ship was sinking was a good sign for the owner, for the extra money he get from the insurance company, can repair the other ship and make the owner rich.

The carpethia was steamed of 4 days before the titanic and was waiting close to the iceberg to arrive the titanic. The plan was to sink the titanic and the help come from the capathia. But the help of the carpathia came to late, because of the captan was waiting for a coulored sain from the titanic, but he never have seen that (he told later).


The Titanic and Olympic were “switched” in an insurance-fraud scheme

It seems that these days you just can’t have a good disaster without a conspiracy theory of one sort or another about how and/or why it happened springing up.  (One wonders how long before the “Costa Concordia Conspiracy” will rear its ugly head?)  Well, the Titanic disaster is no exception: in the late 1990’s, at the height of the wave of “Titanic-mania” that followed James Cameron’s rather soggy cinematic epic, a book appeared, Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank?, authored by one Robin Gardiner, with the premise that the ship which sank in the North Atlantic on April 15, 1912, wasn’t the Titanic after all, but rather her sister ship, the Olympic.  As Gardiner tells the tale, the two ships had their identities switched in an elaborate (and apparently successful) insurance fraud.
Like all good conspiracy theories, this one is incredibly complex, based on several supposedly questionable events and apparent coincidences that occurred (or supposedly did so) between the Titanic’s launch on May 31, 1911, and the ten-second encounter with the iceberg at 11:40 PM on April 14, 1912.  The starting premise of Gardiner’s thesis is that the two ships, the Olympic and Titanic, were designed to be as identical sisters, as alike as two peas in a pod.  By the time the Titanic was launched, this was no longer true, of course, as several modifications had been made to the details of her design before she was even put into the water, details which subtly but unmistakably differentiated the two ships.  Not to be put off by this inconvenient fact, Gardiner blithely sails on to describe how the Olympic, which had gone into White Star Line service in June 1911, turned out to be a rather unlucky ship with a spotty service record, and eventually became such a liability that her owners decided to dispose of her.  In the most sneaky manner possible, of course.
On 20 September 1911, the Olympic was involved in a collision with the Royal Navy’s light cruiser HMS Hawke in the Brambles Channel near Southampton.  Hawke had been inexorably drawn toward the Olympic by the giant liner’s wake (in fact, this incident led to the discovery of a new hydrodynamic principle affecting ships moving in parallel in restricted waters).  So powerful was the suction that the cruiser’s ram bow was driven into the liner’s starboard side, aft of the engine room, damaging the starboard propellor shaft.   (Gardiner falsely claims that the collision damaged the Olympic’s center turbine  mountings and her keel.)  A subsequent Court of Inquiry (at which the new hydrodynamic principle was presented for the first time) found that the Olympic was at fault, and the owners of the ship, the White Star Line and its parent company, International Mercantile Marine, were liable for damages.  As Gardiner spins his yarn, this ruling had dire financial consequences for both White Star and IMM, as White Star’s insurers (Lloyds of London) refused to honor the insurance claim–conveniently ignoring the fact that Lloyd’s did not insure the Olympic, as the White Star Line was self-insured.  What was true was repairs to the Olympic would take nearly two months, forcing White Star to not only absorb the cost of the repairs but also the lost revenue that resulted from the company’s largest, newest, and most glamorous liner being out of service.  An unexpected consequence was that the repairs to the Olympic would set back the completion of the Titanic at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast by a similar span of time, delaying the new ship’s introduction and maiden voyage.
To make matters worse, at least, so Gardiner tells us, the damage to the Olympic proved to be even more serious than was first believed, for after the ship was repaired and returned to service, she supposedly began experiencing severe engine problems which caused her to be returned to Harland and Wolff yet again, this time in February 1912.   The ostensible reason for this return, as told to the public in general, was that the Olympic had lost a propellor blade and that she had to be drydocked to allow its replacement.  This is where Gardiner becomes the most ambitious–and at the same time, the most absurd.  He theorizes that, in order to get at least one of the two liners to sea and earning money, the crippled Olympic was converted into the almost-completed Titanic, the Titanic then assuming her older sister’s identity.  Betraying an almost total ignorance of ships and shipbuilding in general, Gardiner asserts that all that was necessary to accomplish this identity switch was exchanging those parts of the ships which bore the vessels’ names: name plates, bells, navigation equipment, lifeboats, and any interior signing bearing the name Olympic or Titanic.  This, of course, completely ignores the physical differences that already existed between the two ships, for example, the completely reworked accommodations on B and C Decks, which dramatically altered the number and arrangement of the windows and portholes on both decks; the extended enclosure aft on C Deck, the different arrangement of ventilators, fans, piping and machinery on the Boat Deck; the difficulty in changing the shell-plating at the bow and stern which bore the ships’ names (the names weren’t just painted on the plates, they were cut into the plates in letters four feet high and one-half inch deep).  But hey!  It’s a conspiracy theory–why let something as mundane as facts or the truth get in the way of a good fantasy, right?  One last minute alteration was made to the Olympic–supposedly now the “Titanic”-which was done to forever make her distinct from her sister–and at the same time assure that everyone would know that the ship which was to be sunk was indeed the “Titanic.” The forward two-fifths of her Promenade Deck (B Deck) were enclosed by steel screening and glass windows.
(Just in passing, Gardiner also forgets to explain how this switch was to be concealed from the shipyard workers who were working on the two ships–some 15,000 of them–for that matter.  As my friend James Carlisle, Belfast-born and raised, puts it, “How on earth can anyone expect 15,000 Irishmen to keep a secret?”)
The length of the “Titanic’s sea trials is further evidence of the switch, as Gardiner sees it.  The Olympic‘s trials in 1910 required two full days, while the “Titanic’s trials reportedly took less than a day to complete.  By Gardiner’s accounting, why bother conducting sea trials on a ship that had already passed them almost two years earlier?   He also claims that the “Titanic” never traveled faster than one-half her designed top speed, as her damaged hull was too weak to endure the stresses of a prolonged high-speed run.  Any and all documentary records indicating otherwise were, he says, falsified in order to maintain and perpetuate the massive insurance fraud which was about to take place.  (Gardiner conveniently forgets to explain how in just four and one-half days the “Titanic” reached the position where she sank if she was never able to travel at more than 12 knots.  Details, right?)
For that is the heart of Gardiner’s thesis: the switching the two liners was done to perpetrate an insurance fraud on a near-unimaginable scale.  The “Titanic”–actually the crippled and irreparable Olympic–would be lost at sea, and an insurance claim for her total value, some $15,000,000 in 1912, would be filed and of necessity honored.
How this was to be brought about is the most entertaining–and mindlessly absurd–aspect of the entire theory.  It was intended for the “Titanic” to steam into an area where several ships would be waiting nearby, the better to take off the passengers and crew of the stricken liner, where a collision would be staged, the “Titanic’s sea cocks opened, and the ship scuttled, the “victim” of the “damage” suffered in the collision.  Some, though not all, of the ship’s senior officers, including Captain Smith and First Officer Murdoch, were in on the scheme and were tasked with carrying out the “accident” and overseeing a successful evacuation of the ship.  Any loss of lives, no matter how few, was never part of the plan.
Things went awry, though, when, according to Gardiner, in the darkness of a moonless night the “Titanic” actually ran into the stern of one of the waiting rescue ships–the story would later be spun that what the ship struck was actually an iceberg.  This collision did far more extensive damage than the plan had originally allowed for, and the ship sank much more rapidly than had been anticipated, with the resultant horrible loss of life among both passengers and crew.  The rescue ship which had been struck by the “Titanic,” rather than fulfilling her designated purpose, disappears into the night, while other ships in the area, which were standing by, expecting a crippled and slowly sinking “Titanic” to rendezvous with one of them, never answered the “Titanic’s wireless signals of distress or the white rockets fired in a vain effort to attract their attention, the crews of these ships believing that these signals were all part of the “window dressing” of the plan, designed to add credence and verisimilitude to the deception.  So, instead of a neatly contrived insurance fraud, the White Star Line was left with a genuine disaster on its hands, with the loss of over 1500 lives to show for it.
Despite all of the readily apparent holes in Gardiner’s theory, it has gained a surprising amount of traction among the credulous and easily-led, as well as that fringe element that always seems to prefer embracing a conspiracy theory, no matter how far-fetched, to the truth.  Sadly for them, any credence that might have resided in Gardiner’s “insurance-fraud switch theory” was eliminated by a simple three-digit number: 401.  You see, the hull number assigned to the Olympic by her builder, Harland and Wolff, was 400; the number assigned to the Titanic was 401.  This number was cut, stamped, engraved, burned, or painted onto every major component and piece of machinery for each ship, in order to make sure that the correct parts went to the right vessel.  A component for Hull No. 400 would never be used in Hull No. 401, and vice-versa.  And as nearly-identical as the two ships were, as shown earlier, the Olympic and the Titanic were not exact twins.
One difference was their propellors, or screws: the pitch of the two ships’ screws were different. This is, the size, shape, and angle of the propellor blades were slightly different, altering the amount of thrust each screw created as it turned in the water.  Obviously screws of different pitches could not be used on the same ship, as it would create not only differential thrust problems for handling the ship, it would also create severe, even potentially dangerous, vibration.  (Propellor design in the early 20th Century was very much an inexact science, with a lot of “cut-and-try” involved, so it wasn’t uncommon for shipbuilders to use props of different pitches on ships of the same class, to work out which propellor design was the most efficient for that particular class of ship.  This is what was done with the Olympic and Titanic.)  So a propellor blade meant to be installed on the Olympic couldn’t be used on the Titanic, nor could one of the Titanic’s propellor blades be used on the Olympic.
And as luck would have it, in 1986 one of the first expeditions to the wreck of the ship that sank on April 15, 1912, happened to take a photograph of the starboard propellor.  One of the blades is sitting bolt upright, and unmistakably visible on it, almost as clear as the day it was stamped there, is the number “401.”  The Titanic–the real Titanic.
This is one myth that can definitely be described not as “busted” but as “sunk.”